<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;In defence of quirkiness&#8221; (Guardian, U.K.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rushmoreacademy.com/2007/11/22/in-defence-of-quirkiness-guardian-uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rushmoreacademy.com/2007/11/22/in-defence-of-quirkiness-guardian-uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Treadle</title>
		<link>http://www.rushmoreacademy.com/2007/11/22/in-defence-of-quirkiness-guardian-uk#comment-7342</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Treadle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rushmoreacademy.com/index.php/2007/11/22/in-defence-of-quirkiness-guardian-uk/#comment-7342</guid>
		<description>I'd just like to point out that James McDowell has been talking about the 'quirkiness' in current american films (what he called "The Quirky New Wave") since July 2005, in Alternate Takes. Here's the link:

http://www.alternatetakes.co.uk/?2005,7,7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to point out that James McDowell has been talking about the &#8216;quirkiness&#8217; in current american films (what he called &#8220;The Quirky New Wave&#8221;) since July 2005, in Alternate Takes. Here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternatetakes.co.uk/?2005,7,7" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternatetakes.co.uk/?2005,7,7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
